This court extended the time for payment of costs directed to be paid to the respondents, adjourning the matter to a later date when the petitioner shall make the payment. The court recorded disputes regarding the mode of payment and receipt of funds by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.1203 to 1205 of 2018 in SA.No.863 of 2000
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
While allowing the petition, this Court imposed condition that the petitioner
shall pay cost of Rs.5000/- in which Rs.2500/- to the first respondent and the remaining Rs.2500/- to the respondents 4 to 6 on or before 12.12.2019 by order dated 28.11.2019. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cost was accordingly paid to the counsel appearing for the respondents and also filed memo to that effect.
2.Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that this Court ordered additional cost and directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2500/directly to the first respondent and remaining Rs.2500/- to respondents 4 to 6 and not to the counsel on record. Further he also disputed the receipt of cost and he never received the cost paid by the petitioner. Further he submitted that there are some errors in the application itself and as such he sought time to file clarification petition.
3.Considering the above facts and circumstances, the time for payment of
additional cost as directed by this Court to the respondents is extended till 10.01.2020.
4.Post the matter on 13.01.2020
lok
1/2
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
