Ammakannu v. Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C., the appellant failed to appear on the hearing date. The court found no representation and dismissed the second appeal for default without costs.
What did the court decide?
No costs; second appeal dismissed for default due to appellant's absence and failure to appear.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 27.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.457 of 2005
Ammakannu ... Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1. Arumugam
2. Narayanan
3. Ellappa Gounder
4. Kannayiram
5. Muniamma ... Respondents/Defendants
(Causetitle accepted
vide Order of the Court
dated 04.04.2005 made
in CMP.No.4357 of 2005)
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2004 made in
A.S.No.54 of 1991 on the file of Principal Sub-Court,
Tindivanam which confirmed the judgment and decree dated
25.03.1991 made in O.S.No.16 of 1985 on the file of District
Munsif Court, Gingee.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Jayabalan for R1, 2 and 5 JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellant. The learned counsel for respondents 1, 2 and 5 present.
- In the previous hearings i.e., on 14.11.2019 and also on 25.11.2019, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted today (27.11.2019), under the caption, '' for dismissal ''.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ammakkanu
- respondent
Arumugam
- respondent
Narayanan
- respondent
Ellappa Gounder
- respondent
Kannayiram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court