The court allowed Miscellaneous Petitions to condone delays in filing appeals. The petitioners successfully cited reasons involving the collection of details from different districts as valid grounds for the delay.
Miscellaneous Petitions allowed by condoning the delay in filing appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.Nos.10094, 10096, 10098 & 10105 of 2019 in
W.A.SR.Nos.48221, 48518, 48866 & 48871of 2019
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J. AND
P.T.ASHA,J.
These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 78 days, 77 days,
78 days & 86 days respectively in filing the respective appeals.
reasons for the delay in preferring the appeals. The applications are opposed by the respondent in the concerned petitions on the ground that
no justifiable reasons are given to condone the delay.
and the counter affidavit filed by the respondent.
collected from different districts and the same resulted in the delay in
filing the appeals. We are convinced with the reasons given by the
petitioners. We therefore, allow the Miscellaneous Petitions by condoning the delay.
vsi
Note: Registry to print the name of M/s. G.Bala and Daisy, counsel for the appellants,
when the appeals are posted for admission.
2
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J.
Vsi
C.M.P.Nos.10094, 10096, 10098
& 10105 of 2019
in
W.A.SR.Nos.48221, 48518,
48866 & 48871of 2019
18.06.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing appeals C.M.P.Nos.10094, 10096, 10098 & 10105 of 2019 in W.A.SR.Nos.48221, 48518, 48866 & 48871 of 2019.
Petitioners (unnamed)
K.K. Sasidharan
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
