Disposed

Minor R.Sreeram, v. Jasmine

Madras HC14 Dec 2019CMA/1820/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chennai High Court reached a National Lok Adalat session to settle a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the appellant against a Motor Accidents Tribunal award. The parties settled by confirming the Tribunal's award, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal disposed of; connected petition closed; court fee refund directed; records sent to trial court for withdrawal of compensation.

Minor R.Sreeram, Vs Jasmine — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organized by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 14th December, 2019

¶3

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided over by

¶6

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶7

and

¶8

Members : Mr.G.Dhanaraj Mr.V. Shanmugasundaram

¶9

C.M.A.No. 1820 of 2006

¶10

(Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed on 20.08.2004 in M.C.O.P.No.404 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, and Additional Special Judge, Krishnagiri) Minor R. Sreeram ... Appellant /petitioner (Rep.by guardian father K.R.Raveendran) Vs. 1.Jasmine 2.National Insurance Company Ltd., Division Office, Parameswaran Pillai Bhavan, Hospital Road, Kollam -691 001. Kerala State ...Respondents

¶11

This case is taken up for settlement before the National Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.M.Viswa Bharath for M/s.V.Nicholas, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.S.Arun Kumar, the learned counsel for the second respondent are present. After discussion and negotiation, the matter is settled as follows:

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

¶14

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶15

The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.62,635/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit and costs as compensation. Challenging the quantum of compensation, the

¶16

appellant/Insurance Company has preferred the present appeal.

¶17

2. After due deliberation and consultation, both the parties have agreed to

¶18

confirm the award passed by the Tribunal and seeking permission to withdraw this appeal.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and since the appellant/claimant has accepted the award passed by the trial court, this Lok Adalath confirms the award passed by the Tribunal.

¶20

It is represented that the award amount was already deposited before the Tribunal. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the said amount.

¶21

5.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed, if any.

¶22

Minor R. Sreeram (Rep.by guardian father K.R.Raveendran) Counsel for the Appellant

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

¶25

National Insurance Company Ltd., Division Office, Parameswaran Pillai Bhavan, Hospital Road, Kollam -691 001.

¶26

Kerala State Counsel for the second respondent

¶27

This National Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶28

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of

¶29

Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶30

Judge Member Member

¶31

Note to Office : The Registry is directed to send the records to the concerned trial court immediately to enable the appellant to withdraw the compensation amount.

¶32

To:The parties/Advocate concerned

¶33

Copy to:

¶34

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, and Additional Special Judge, Krishnagiri

¶35

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶36

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶37

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶38

¶39

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.

¶40

P.RAJAMANICKAM, J.

¶41

sbn/gv

¶42

C.M.A.No.1820 of 2006
14.12.2019

¶43

14.12.2019 (½)

¶44

http://www.judis.nic.in

Minor R.Sreeram, v. Jasmine

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Minor R.Sreeram, v. Jasmine

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Srinivasan Vs N Anbuchezhiyan

K.Babu Vs P.Thilagavathi

P.Nithya Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Sathyanarayanan, Vs Jasmine

A.Murugan Vs C.P.Vinod

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Ranjitha