Petitioner filed a contempt petition in this court dated 25.09.2018 for wilful disobedience. Upon filing, the High Court noted that the statutory notice was served but the respondent had not appeared. The court recorded that a final report had been filed in the case and closed the petition without any further proceedings or disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :13.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Cont.P.No.696 of 2019
K.Babu ... Petitioner
Vs.
P. Thilagavathi ... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Court, to punish the respondent for committing wilful
disobedience to the order of this court in Crl.OP.No.22815 of 2018
dated 25.09.2018.
For Petitioner : M/s.Jayasri Baskar
for Mr.K.V.Sridharan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner to
punish the respondent for committing wilful disobedience to the
order of this court in Crl.O.P.No.22815 of 2018 dated 25.09.2018.
2
2. As per the order passed by this court dated 20.11.2019, statutory notice was sent to the respondent on 29.11.2019. but the served notice not yet returned. Respondent also not appeared in person. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that she came to know that a final report has been filed in the above case and the case was taken on file in C.C.No.646 of
2019 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Namakkal.
High Court, Madras.
3
P.RAJAMANICKAM., J.
gv
Cont.P.No.696 of 2019
13.12.2019
K. Babu
P. Thilagavathi
P. RAJAMANICKAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
