M.Palaniappan, v. Mr.Ramesh, The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of an order regarding land measurement and removal of encroachment. The Court recorded the respondent's representation that the order was complied with and the petitioner conceded, leading to the closure of the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed after the respondent's compliance was recorded and the petitioner's concession was not.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD) No.1370 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
Cont.P.(MD) No.1370 of 2019 in
W.P.(MD) No.18617 of 2018
M.Palaniappan
... Petitioner / Petitioner
-vs-
Mr.Ramesh, Then Tahsildar, Taluk Office of Thirumayam Taluk, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
...contemnor/ Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Palaniappan
- respondent
Mr.Ramesh
Coram
T.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court