First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after multiple listed hearings and notices were sent to the appellant who failed to appear.
First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A.S.No.491 of 2010
Chinnasamy ..Petitioner
Rajeswari ..Respondent
Prayer : First Appeal filed Under Section 96 of CPC r/w 19 of the Family Court Act against the Judgment & Decree dated 23.01.2006 passed in O.S.No.17 of 2000 on the file of Family Court, Salem.
For Petitioner : Non-appearance
For Respondent : Non-appearance O R D E R
The appeal suit was listed for hearing on 04.12.2019. None appeared for the petitioner. Thus, the appeal suit was directed to be listed “for dismissal” on 05.12.2019. When the matter is listed on 05.12.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Inspite of the fact that two opportunities were given to the appellant, there was no representation.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssb To,
The Family Court,Salem. Copy to:
The Section Officer,VR Section, High Court,Madras.
A.S.No.491 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ A.SK(27/01/2020)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinnasamy
Rajeswari
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
