Vasuki v. Ramakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant brought counsel's attention to the settled issues in the underlying suit, seeking permission to withdraw the first appeal. The Court granted permission and dismissed the appeal suit as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the first appeal; appeal suit dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
A.S.No.1006 of 2008
Vasuki ...Appellant
Vs.
1.Ramakrishnan
2.Manogari
3.Manivannan
4.Lakshmi
5.Selvi
6.Manikandan
7.Thilagavathy
(Cause title accepted vide order of this Court
dated 08.12.2008 made in M.P.No.1 of 2008)
...Respondents
Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 C.P.C., 1908 against the
Judgement and Final Decree dated 30.10.2000 in I.A.No.232 of
2001 in O.S.No.85 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Additional
District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal.
For Appellant : Mr.R.T.Shyamala
For Respondent : Mr.R.Saravanan
for M/s.Sai and Bharath
for first Respondent
R.2 to R.7 not ready in notice.
ORDER
The respective learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as the respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the issues between the parties to the Appeal Suit have already been settled.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vasuki
- respondent
Ramakrishnan
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court