Article 9571 of 2019 in C.S.601 of 2019. Court held that it suffices to array any one unknown person as a respondent. Application to implead respondents 44 to 51 was partly allowed, directing impleadment of deceased persons as per earlier judgment.
Application to implead unknown persons as respondents 44 to 51 partly allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.9571 of 2019 in C.S.No.601 of 2019
Dr.G.Jayachandran, J.
The plaintiff who has filed the
John Doe suit wants to implead the unknown persons as respondents. Hence taken this application to implead the respondents 44 to 51 as unknown respondents. 2. This Court is of the opinion that it is suffice to be arrayed anyone unknown person as respondent. Hence the application is partly allowed and the unknown person shall be impleaded as respondents 44 consonance to the judgment of this Court rendered in M/s.R.K.Productions Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and 19 others reported in 2012-5-L.W.626.
11.12.2019 rpl 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether it is sufficient to implead unknown persons as respondents in a suit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s.R.K.Productions Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and 19 othersApplied¶3
2012-5-L.W.626
John Doe
Dr.G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
