K.Kokilamma v. a.Murugan and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Order granting leave to plaintiff to institute suit against non-resident defendants 2 and 3 because the subject property is within court jurisdiction. No judgment text available for substantive proposition.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No. 6290 of 2019 in C.S.SR.No. 92729 of 2019
A.No. 6290 of 2019 in
C.S.SR.No. 92729 of 2019
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
The suit is one for declaration
and recovery of possession of the
property, which is situate within the
jurisdiction of this Court. The
defendants 2 and 3 reside outside the
jurisdiction of this Court. Considering
the fact that the property subject matter
of the suit is situate within the
jurisdiction of this Court, this application
is allowed granting leave to the plaintiff
to institute the suit as against the
defendants 2 and 3 in this Court.
28.08.2019
kkn
1
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court