Disposed
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. v. Sabbir Noormohmad Malek
Madras HCA/299/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2019 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. This…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.299 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 25.10.2019, directed the respondent to furnish security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.6,43,496/-, on or before 22.11.2019, failing which, an order of attachment order would be
passed.
that effect enclosing returned cover. Though the name of the respondent is
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
vsm
also printed in the cause list, there is no representation for him either in person or through counsel. Hence, service to the respondent is held sufficient. In the above circumstances, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. The order of attachment shall be transmitted through the Principal District Court, Ahmedabad, Gujarat and the attachment order may be hand delivered
to the applicant for transmission.
adjudication and this application stands closed. The parties are free to take
such action, as they may desire hereinafter, in accordance with law.
22.11.2019
vsm
Application No.299 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court