Disposed
M/S.Daimler Financial Services v. Ppm Infrazone Pvt. Ltd.
Madras HCA/2224/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
A.No.2224 of 2018 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2224 of 2018
A.No.2224 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.
This application is taken out for appointing a receiver to seize and deliver the vehicle based on two contracts. As early as on 14.03.2018, this Court had appointed a receiver for seizure of the vehicle with respect to both the contracts. It is now stated that so far as contract No.20129793 is concerned, the vehicle has already been seized. With respect to the other contract No.20129792 is concerned, an award has been passed on 09.02.2019 and the vehicle is yet to be repossessed. Hence, the time granted to the receiver is extended by six weeks. 2.Accordingly, this application stands closed. 21.11.2019 pnn
A.No.2224 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.
pnn
A.No.2224 of 2018
21.11.2019
pushpa sathyanarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court