Allowed

Bridget Leena Thangam v. Pradeep D.

Madras HC9 Apr 2019OP/71/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In O.P.No. 71 of 2019, a petition filed by the mother for custody of a minor child was disposed of by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in terms of a compromise agreement signed by the parties, appointing the mother as the sole guardian subject to visitation rights.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of the compromise; memorandum attached to decree. O.A.No. 95 closed.

Bridget Leena Thangam Vs Pradeep D. — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.04.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

O.P.No. 71 of 2019 and

¶7

O.A.No. 95 of 2019

¶8

S.Bridget Leena Thangam ..Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

D.Pradeep ..Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Sections. 3, 7, 10 and Section. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w O XXI Rules 2, 3 and 11 of O.S. Rules and Clause 17 of the letters patent praying as follows to appoint the petitioner as the Guardian of the person of the minor child, Johanna Megalai, born on 10.05.2010 now aged 8 years and to grant permanent custody of the person of the minor child, Johanna Megalai, born on 10.05.2010 now aged 8 years to the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.Annapoorani. G For Respondent : M/s.M.Thomas Acquinas

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Petition filed under Sections. 3, 7, 10 and Section. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w O XXI Rules 2, 3 and 11 of O.S. Rules and Clause 17 of the letters patent praying as follows to appoint the petitioner as the Guardian of the person of the minor child, Johanna Megalai, born on 10.05.2010 now aged 8 years and to grant permanent custody of the person of the minor child to the petitioner.

¶15

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶16

¶17

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶18

kkn

¶19

O.P.No. 71 of 2019 has been filed by the mother seeking custody of the

¶20

minor child Johanna Megalai, born on 10.05.2010. The parties have entered into a compromise in and by which the respondent, the father of the child has agreed that the mother of the child shall be the sole guardian subject to a certain visitation rights as detailed in the memorandum of compromise. The memo of compromise has been signed by the parties as well as the counsels. Hence, the

¶21

original petition is disposed of in terms of compromise. The memorandum of compromise will form in part of the decree.

¶22

In view of the disposal of O.P.71 of 2019, O.A.No. 94 of 2019 is closed

¶23

as no further orders are necessary. No costs.

¶24

09.04.2019

¶25

kkn

¶26

O.P.No. 71 of 2019 and O.A.No. 95 of 2019

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

Bridget Leena Thangam v. Pradeep D.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bridget Leena Thangam v. Pradeep D.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Charles S/O.Late Mr.S.Doss Vs Mrs.Glory and 3 Others

Dr.M.Sudheer S/O.Mahadeer Singh Vs M.Kamaraj S/O.Manackraj

M.Subhathra W/O.Late R.Mohan Vs Angammal W/O.Late Rajabather

Ravikumar N. Vs Kalpana S.

Estate of C.G.Chellakrishnan Vs

Saravana Selvan Vs State Rep by