Held service on respondent sufficient. Ordered attachment of respondent's property as security for arbitration award and closed the application.
Accorded an order of attachment to be transmitted through the Principal District Judge, Jalna.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.6690 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 16.09.2019, directed the respondent to furnish
security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.5,53,489.07/-, on or before 21.10.2019, failing which, an order of attachment order would be passed.
award in arbitration between the applicant and the respondent has been passed on 10.09.2018.
acknowledgment card. Though the name of the respondent is printed
in the cause list, there is no representation for him either in person or through counsel.
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
srn
Hence, service to the respondent is held sufficient. In the above circumstances, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. The order of attachment shall be transmitted through the Principal District Judge, Jalna, Maharashtra and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission.
Applicant
Respondent
Pushpa Sathyanaarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
