Allowed

John Bosco v. the District Collector

Madras HC24 Sept 2018WP(MD)/8321/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed seeking direction to grant draught relief fund for missing beneficiaries. Court directed Additional Chief Secretary to pass orders on pending recommendation and direct officials to complete action within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Additional Chief Secretary to pass orders on pending recommendation and direct officials to do needful within 12 weeks.

John Bosco Vs the District Collector — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.09.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶7

W.P.(MD) No.8321 of 2018

John Bosco

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 4.The Tahsildar, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 5.The Special Tahsildar, Agricultural Disaster Management, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant draught relief fund for 2016-2017 for the list of missing beneficiaries from serial No.90 to 120 of Sooranam Village, Sivagangai District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananda Kumar

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam Additional Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

¶17

This writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondents to grant draught relief fund for 2016-2017 for the list of missing beneficiaries from serial No.90 to 120 of Sooranam

¶18

¶19

Village, Sivagangai District.

¶20

2.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶21

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Additional Government Pleader produced a communication sent by the District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai in Na.Ka.NC1/17284/2017 dated 21.06.2018, by which recommendation has been made to the Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue, Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai, which is stated to be pending consideration.

¶22

4.In such view of the matter, we direct the Additional Chief Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue, Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid recommendation dated 21.06.2018 and thereafter direct the concerned officials to do the needful within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

5.This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶24

Assistant Registrar ( ) // True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-Iv)

¶26

¶27

1.The Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Revenue Administration,

¶28

Revenue, Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai.

¶29

2.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶30

3.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶31

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶32

¶33

5.The Tahsildar, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶34

6.The Special Tahsildar, Agricultural Disaster Management, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶35

- 1 CC TO MR.N.ANANDA KUMAR, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.87226

¶36

- 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, IN SR NO.86606

¶37

¶38

BU/PM/SAR-IV :15.10.2018 : 3P/9C

¶39

W.P.(MD) No.8321 of 2018 24.09.2018

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

John Bosco v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

John Bosco v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Thomas, S/O.Mariadoss Vs the Superintendent of Police

R. Priya W/O Rajalingam Vs the Superintendent of Police

A. Justin, Vs the Superintendent of Police

S. Vaithiyalingam, Vs the Commissioner

Govindaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Kubendran Vs the Superintendent of Police