P. Kubendran v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
In a petition for Habeas Corpus regarding the petitioner's minor daughter, the court recorded the detenu's statement that she wished to travel with the petitioner, noting this as the basis for closure.
What did the court decide?
Habeas Corpus petition closed after detenu wished to go with the petitioner.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.09.2018 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.[MD].No.1308 of 2018
P.Kubendran
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Surveyor Colony, Madurai 625 007.
2.The Inspector of Police, Vikkiramangalam Police Station, Madurai District.
3.Ranjith
- 4.Mayee 5.Lingeswari : Respondents
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent police to produce the body or person of the detenu, the petitioner's minor daughter, namely, Saranya, aged about 16 years, before this Court and hand over the custody to the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ of Habeas Corpus filed for the production of the detenu should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Kubendran
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Surveyor Colony, Madurai 625 007
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, Vikkiramangalam Police Station, Madurai District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court