Allowed

Arumuga Pandian v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC13 Apr 2018WP(MD)/8068/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench allowed a writ petition seeking permission to conduct a temple festival event ('Aadal Padal') at evening hours. The Court directed the Superintendent and Inspector of Police to grant permission within one week, subject to appropriate conditions for smooth conduct.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent is directed to grant permission within one week incorporating appropriate conditions to ensure smooth conduct of the event.

Arumuga Pandian Vs the Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.04.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.8068 of 2018

¶6

Arumuga Pandian ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruneveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶9

2.The Inspector of Police, Tisyanvillai Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to grant permission to conduct the ''Aadal Padal Kalai Nigalchi'' at the evening hours on 07.05.2018 and 08.05.2018 from 9.00 p.m. to 12.00 a.m. on the eve of the festival in Arulmigu Sri Mutharamman Temple, Chithirai Festival at Muthumothan Mozhi Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vasaharajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Government Advocate

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner herein wants to conduct Aadal Padal event on 07.05.2018 and 08.05.2018 in connection with ''Chithirai Festival'' in Arulmigu Sri Mutharamman Temple, at Muthumothan Mozhi Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District . He has given a representation, dated 04.04.2018, in this regard.

¶14

2.The second respondent is directed to grant permission within a period of one week from today. This Court while allowing similar petitions has directed the authorities to incorporate certain conditions. The second respondent while granting permission shall incorporate appropriate conditions to ensure the smooth conduct of the event in question. This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

¶15

Sd/

¶16

Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶17

/True copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

¶21

¶22

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruneveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶23

2.The Inspector of Police, Tisyanvillai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶24

+1cc to M/s.Special Government Pleader,SR.No. 61636

¶25

+1cc to Mr.M.VASAHARAJAN, Advocate, SR.No. 61481

¶26

W.P.(MD)No.8068 of 2018

¶27

13.04.2018

¶28

SMN2 KK/SV MMS/18.04.2018/SAR-1/2P-5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arumuga Pandian v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arumuga Pandian v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Swathick @ Anand, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramamoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

Sridhar Pappy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Thenmozhi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Maheswari, W/O.Mathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathatha Sri Vaishnava Vs the District Registrar