This judgment dismisses two Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which were withdrawn by the petitioners with the consent of the court, thus closing the connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.06.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.Iyyappan : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.7707 of 2013 R.Radhakrishnan : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.7708 of 2013
Vs.
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
: Respondent in both W.Ps.
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioners to operate the vehicles bearing Regn.No.TN 72 W 7155 and Regn.No.TN 74 C 6742 respectively on the deviated course of road via Suseendiram and Ethangadu, till such time the road condition is made good on the original course of road.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.C.Chandrasekaran For Respondent : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader ****** COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
+2cc to Mr.K.SURESH KUMAR, Advocate, SR.No. 67838,67837 +1cc to M/s.Special Government Pleader,SR.No. 67777
W.P.(MD)Nos.7707 and 7708 of 2013
11.06.2018
SML KK/SV MMS/SAR-2/25.06.2018/2P-5C/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petitions seeking permission to operate vehicles on a deviated course should be allowed or dismissed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Three Judges caseReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Iyyappan
R.Radhakrishnan
The Regional Transport Officer
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
