Fall River Solutions (P) Ltd., v. Secretary to Govt. of India

Madras HC8 Jun 2018WP(MD)/10732/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain respondents from acquiring the petitioner's land or demolishing buildings without due process. The second respondent filed a counter-affidavit assuring no action pending additional publication. The court recorded this assurance and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed with assurance given by respondent; No costs.

Fall River Solutions (P) Ltd., Vs Secretary to Govt. of India — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.06.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.10732 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)No.9828 of 2018

¶7

Fall River Solutions (P) Ltd., 573, Tagoor Nagar, Sirudhur Village, Tiruppalai, New Natham Road, Madurai-625 014, Rep. by its Managing Director. : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶10

2.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, K.K.Nagar, Madurai.

¶11

3.The Competent Authority -cumDistrict Revenue Officer (LA-NH 785), District Collectorate, Madurai. : Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from either acquiring our land admeasuring 82 Square Metres situated in R.S.No.126/6, Sirudhur Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District or demolishing a portion of our building structures thereon without following due process of law.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.E.Ilango For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar For Respondent No.3 : Mrs.V.P.M.Vaishnavi, Government Advocate

¶14

ORDER

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from either acquiring our land admeasuring 82 Square

¶16

¶17

Metres situated in R.S.No.126/6, Sirudhur Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District or demolishing a portion of our building structures thereon without following due process of law.

¶18

The second respondent has filed a counter-affidavit in the

¶19

above Writ Petition, wherein, an assurance is given that no action will be taken in respect of the petitioner's land in R.S.No.126/6, Sirudhur Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District, till additional publication for acquisition is made under Section 3A(1) of the National Highways Act, 1956.

¶20

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(AE)

¶23

/True copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶27

2.The Project Director,

¶28

National Highways Authority of India, K.K.Nagar, Madurai.

¶29

3.The Competent Authority -cum-

¶30

District Revenue Officer (LA-NH 785), District Collectorate,

¶31

Madurai.

¶32

+1cc to Mr.M.E.Ilango, Advocate, SR.No.67431.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Advocate, SR.No.67317. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.67897.

¶34

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.10732 of 2018 Dated: 08.06.2018

¶35

sml

¶36

RAM/SV MMS/SAR 4/26.06.2018/2P/7C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Fall River Solutions (P) Ltd., v. Secretary to Govt. of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fall River Solutions (P) Ltd., v. Secretary to Govt. of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.M.Shanmuganathan, Vs the Director of Town and

A.Balu, S/O.Avadaiappa Pillai, Vs the Director

Durga Devi Vs the Director of Town and

M/S.Sri Sankari Yarns Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State Tax Officer (Main)

Tvl.Al Madhina Timbers & Saw Vs the Commissioner of Commercial

M/S.Pandian Motors Vs the Assistant Commissioner