Dismissed

Subramani, S/O. Raja Pillai, v. the District Collector

Madras HC2 Mar 2018WP(MD)/612/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed two writ petitions seeking permission to conduct cockfights on Pongal days after the petitioners sought and obtained liberty to withdraw the petitions with a promise to work out remedies administratively.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to work out the remedy administratively was granted.

Subramani, S/O. Raja Pillai, Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 02.03.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

W.P(MD)Nos.612 & 660 of 2018 1.W.P(MD)No.612 of 2018:-

¶7

Subramani ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Gugiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶11

3.The Secretary, Animal Welfare Board, No.13/1, 3^rd Sea Ward, Thiruvanmaiyur.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to conduct the cock fight in L.Pudur, Guziliamparai Post, Karikelei Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District during the pongal days ie., 14.01.2018 to 16.01.2018.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pugalendhi For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu, Additional Government Pleader. For R – 3 : Mr.Suresh 2.W.P(MD)No.660 of 2018:- Murugesan ... Petitioner

¶15

Vs.

¶16

1.The District Collector, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Dindigul District.

¶17

¶18

2.The Inspector of Police, Gugiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶19

3.The Secretary, Animal Welfare Board, No.13/1, 3^rd Sea Ward, Thiruvanmaiyur. ... Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to conduct the cock fight in Alampatti Village, Sathirapatti Post, Palayam via, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District during the pongal days ie., 29.01.2018 to 31.01.2018.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pugalendhi For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu, Additional Government Pleader.

¶22

For R – 3 : Mr.Suresh

¶23

COMMON ORDER

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.)

¶25

After some arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions, with liberty to work out their remedy administratively and also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶26

2.In the light of the endorsement so made, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn and the liberty sought for by the petitioners, is granted. No costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Gugiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶33

+2CC to Mr.S.Pugalendhi, Advocate, SR.No. 53050 & 53051

¶34

W.P(MD)Nos.612 & 660 of 2018 02.03.2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

¶37

AM/SKN RSK/SAR 3/16.03.2018/2P/5C

Subramani, S/O. Raja Pillai, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subramani, S/O. Raja Pillai, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New Sun Beam Builders Pvt.Ltd Vs M/S. Pujyashri Bhaskaracharya

The Secretary Vs S.Mookiah

V.Subramanian Vs the Union of India

V.Raman, Vs the Superintende of Police

Sankaranarayanan Vs the Director of Vigilance &

J.S.Arthur, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu