Remanded

V.Arjunan v. the Principal Secretary to

Madras HC21 Mar 2018WP(MD)/3270/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Madurai Corporation employee, sought 5% personal pay via application to extend a Government Order. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Commissioner to refer the application to the Government and ordered the Principal Secretary to decide on merits within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directions for first respondent to pass orders on merits within twelve weeks; third respondent to forward representation to Government.

V.Arjunan Vs the Principal Secretary to — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 21.03.2018

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.3270 of 2018

V.Arjunan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (CMPC) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George,

¶11

Chennai – 600 009.

¶12

The Director of Municipal Administration,

¶13

Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶14

The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay 5% basic pay as personal pay by extending G.O.Ms.No.176, Finance (CMPC) Department dated 30.04.2009 by considering petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2017 within the time frame.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mandhiralingeswaran For Respondents : Mr.K.Saravanan for R1 & R2 Mr.T.S.Md.Mohideen for R3

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶19

2.The petitioner is a serving employee of the Madurai Corporation. He seeks payment of 5% of his basic pay as personal pay. He wants conferment of this relief by extension of G.O.Ms.No.176, Finance (CMPC) Department dated 30.04.2009. He has given a representation in this regard on 26.07.2017.

¶20

3.The third respondent is directed to forward the said https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ representation to the Government through the second respondent. The first respondent is directed to pass orders on the

¶21

¶22

petitioner's representation on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

4.This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (CMPC) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.S.Mandhiralingeswaran, Advocate Sr.No.57219 +1cc to Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen, Advocate Sr.No.56869 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.57279 skm

¶28

VB/SV/SAR4/03/05/2018/2P/7C

¶29

W.P(MD)No.3270 of 2018 21.03.2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Arjunan v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Arjunan v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Kathiresan, S/O.Veluchamy Vs the Secretary to Govt.

R.Senthamarai Kannan Vs the Director of Medical

N.v.Nagaiah, Vs the Principal Secretary

Ar.Lakshmanan Vs the Director of School

R.Selvi, Vs the Principal Secretary to

M.Sulthan Ameer Vs the Principal Secretary to