Disposed

R.Selvi, v. the Principal Secretary to

Madras HC21 Mar 2018WP(MD)/3269/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a serving employee of Madurai Corporation seeking payment of 5% basic pay as personal pay for her deceased husband. The court directed the authorities to process the representation and issue final orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to third respondent to forward representation and to first respondent to pass orders on merits within twelve weeks.

R.Selvi, Vs the Principal Secretary to — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 21.03.2018 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶3

W.P(MD)No.3269 of 2018

¶4

R.Selvi ... Petitioner Vs.

¶5

The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (CMPC) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George,

¶6

Chennai – 600 009.

¶7

The Director of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶8

The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay 5% basic pay as personal pay by extending G.O.Ms.No.176, Finance (CMPC) Department dated 30.04.2009 to petitioner's husband Late A.Raj who worked as a Meter Reader in the third respondent's corporation by considering petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2017 within the time frame.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mandhiralingeswaran For Respondents : Mr.K.Saravanan for R1 & R2 Mr.T.S.Md.Mohideen for R3

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶13

2.The petitioner is a serving employee of the Madurai Corporation. She seeks payment of 5% of his basic pay as personal pay. She wants conferment of this relief by extension of G.O.Ms.No.176, Finance (CMPC) Department dated 30.04.2009. She has given a representation in this regard on 01.08.2017.

¶14

3.The third respondent is directed to forward the said representation to the Government through the second respondent. The first respondent is directed to pass orders on the petitioner's representation on merits and in accordance with law, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

¶16

4.This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶18

/True Copy/

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (CMPC) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶22

The Director of Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶23

The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

¶24

+1cc to Mr.S.Mandhiralingeswaran, Advocate Sr.No.57218 +1cc to Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Advocate Sr.No.56868

¶25

SKM

¶26

VB/SV/SAR4/03/05/2018/2P/6C

¶27

W.P(MD)No.3269 of 2018 21.03.2018

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Selvi, v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Selvi, v. the Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Kathiresan, S/O.Veluchamy Vs the Secretary to Govt.

R.Senthamarai Kannan Vs the Director of Medical

N.v.Nagaiah, Vs the Principal Secretary

Ar.Lakshmanan Vs the Director of School

V.Arjunan Vs the Principal Secretary to

M.Sulthan Ameer Vs the Principal Secretary to