Disposed

I.Parvathi, W/O.Maharajan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Dec 2018WP(MD)/24040/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of writ petitions seeking quashing of an impugned order regarding recruitment for Junior Assistant posts. The Court held that identical relief has already been granted in a connected batch, making a separate order unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

None; petitions closed in light of identical relief already granted in connected batch W.P.(MD).No.23562 of 2018.

I.Parvathi, W/O.Maharajan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.12.2018

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

W.P.(MD).Nos.24040 & 24041 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.21746 to 21749 of 2018

1.I.Parvathi

2.S.Packiarose

3.N.Devika

4.P.Ayyammal

¶11

5.S.Sulochana

¶12

.. Petitioners in W.P.(MD).No.24040 of 2018

¶13

1.Muthu Krishnan

¶14

2.T.JothiEswari

¶15

3.P.Lenin

¶16

4.J.R.Jebasastin Ruba

¶17

5.R.Uma Maheswari

¶18

6.J.Chermamalathi

¶19

.. Petitioners in W.P.(MD).No.24041 of 2018

¶20

-Vs-

¶21

The State of Tamilnadu represented by the Additional Secretary, Higher Education (H2) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶22

Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Represented by the Registrar, Abhishekapatti, Tirunelveli – 12. .. Respondents in both petitions

¶23

Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Letter No.19823/H2/2018-1 issued by the 1^st Respondent dated 23.10.2018 quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to complete the recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement, dated 31.07.2018, issued by the 2^nd Respondent published in the newspaper and the Web site to the post of Junior Assistant.

¶24

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Geetha For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah for R1 Additional Government Pleader

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

Mr.Mahaboob Athiff for R2

in both petitions

ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Letter No.19823/H2/2018-1 issued by the 1^st Respondent dated 23.10.2018 quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to complete the recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement, dated 31.07.2018, issued by the 2^nd Respondent published in the newspaper and the Web site to the post of Junior Assistant.

¶31

2.This Court on 29.11.2018 in a similar batch of writ petitions in W.P.(MD).No.23562 of 2018 has already quashed the proceedings of the first respondent and given a specific direction to the second respondent to complete the recruitment process and report to the Registry. Therefore, no separate order is required in these writ petitions.

¶32

3.Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶35

/True Copy/

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶37

¶38

The Additional Secretary, Higher Education (H2) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶39

The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abhishekapatti, Tirunelveli – 12.

¶40

2 CC TO M/s.D.GEETHA, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 98730 & 98729

¶41

- 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 98929

¶42

¶43

TE/RSK/SAR-1 : 17/12/2018 : 2P/6C

¶44

W.P.(MD).Nos.24040 & 24041 of 2018

¶45

05.12.2018

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

I.Parvathi, W/O.Maharajan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

I.Parvathi, W/O.Maharajan v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Pandichelvam, Vs the Member Secretary

A.Kumar, Vs Teachers Recruitment Board

G.Ramamoorthi Vs Teachers Recruitment Board

Thenmozhi, Vs the District Collector

M.Sivajothi, Vs the Principal Secretary to

K.Ravikumar, Vs the Secretary to Govt