Partly allowed

Eswaramoorthy, v. the Assistant Director

Madras HC26 Nov 2018WP(MD)/23361/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the non-release of a vehicle seized by authorities for suspected illegal sand transportation. The Court directed the respondents to release the vehicle to the petitioner within 7 days upon satisfaction of specific conditions. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle returned within 7 days subject to documents, deposit of Rs.50,000, undertaking against illegal use, no alienation, and participation in inquiry.

Eswaramoorthy, Vs the Assistant Director — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 26.11.2018 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN W.P(MD)No.23361 of 2018

¶4

Eswaramoorthy ..Petitioner

¶5

¶6

1.The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology, Sivagangai District.

¶7

2.The Sub Collector / Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai,

¶8

Sivagangai District.

¶9

3.The Inspector of Police, Singampunari Police Station, Sivagangai District. ..Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle, AL Tusker bearing Registration No.TN-29-AT-5017 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner dated 29.10.2018.

¶11

For Petitioner :Mr.S.M.Sanjay

¶12

For Respondents :Mr.P.Kannidevan Additional Government Pleader

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle AL Tusker bearing Registration No.TN-29-AT-5017.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶16

According to the petitioner, the official respondent has seized the vehicle in question on the ground that it was involved in transportation of illegal river sand without any valid permit and the vehicle is still under the police custody. Hence, this Writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Petition is filed.

¶17

¶18

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of river sand without any valid permit and hence, it was seized.

¶19

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the official respondent from the date of seizing and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to sun and rain, it would certainly diminish its value. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the vehicle may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner for release of the same.

¶20

Accordingly, the concerned respondent is directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order subject to the following conditions:

¶21

“(i) The petitioner shall produce necessary documents before the concerned respondent to establish the ownership of the vehicle in question;

¶22

(ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), before the second respondent as non refundable deposit;

¶23

(iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents;

¶24

(iv) On doing so, the vehicle in question shall be returned to the petitioner;

¶25

(v) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned; and

¶26

(vi) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.”

¶27

However, it is made clear that if the vehicle involves in the crime for second time, the concerned respondent shall not release the vehicle.

¶28

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶30

/True copy/

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶32

¶33

1.The Assistant Director,

¶34

Mines and Geology,

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sivagangai District.

¶36

¶37

2.The Sub Collector / Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶38

3.The Inspector of Police, Singampunari Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶39

+1cc to Mr.S.M.SANJAY, Advocate, SR.No.96865

¶40

+1cc to M/s.Special Government Pleader,SR.No. 97058

¶41

W.P(MD)No.23361 of 2018

¶42

PNN

¶43

KK/PM/SAR-3/30.11.2018/3P-6C

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Eswaramoorthy, v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eswaramoorthy, v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Kannan, Contractor Vs the Tender Inviting

N. Kannan, Vs the Tender Inviting Authority

J.Celin Pragasi Vs the Superintendending Engineer

Kanagaraj, Vs the Assistant Director

Muthu, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

K.Asokan Vs the Commissioner of Land