Disposed

Muthu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC26 Nov 2018WP(MD)/23429/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought judicial intervention to release his vehicle seized by police for illegal gravel transport. The Court ordered release within seven days subject to depositing a sum, producing ownership documents, and undertaking not to re-offend.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle released within 7 days subject to deposit of Rs.50,000, production of ownership documents, and undertaking against future illegal activities.

Muthu, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 26.11.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶3

W.P(MD)No.23429 of 2018

¶4

Muthu ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri Revenue Division, Musiri,

¶5

Trichy District.

¶6

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Kattuputhur,

¶7

Trichy District.

¶8

3.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Trichy District, Trichy. ..Respondents`

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to release the Petitioner's Mahendra Bolero Maxi Truck bearing Registration No. TN 30 BV 4430 Bolero Pickup, seized on 18.7.2018 and keeping under the custody of the second respondent by considering his representations, dated 18.10.2018 and 21.11.2018.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arun Raj For Respondents : Mr.S.Dhayalan Government Advocate

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to release the petitioner's Vehcile/Mahendra Bolero Maxi Truck bearing Registration No. TN 30 BV 4430 Bolero Pickup.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶14

According to the petitioner, the official respondent has seized the vehicle in question on the ground that it was involved in transportation of Gravel without any valid permit and the vehicle is still under the police custody. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed.

¶15

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the vehicle in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ question was used for illegal transportation of Gravel without any valid permit and hence, it was seized.

¶16

¶17

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the official respondent from the date of seizing and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to sun and rain, it would certainly diminish its value. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the vehicle may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner for release of the same.

¶18

Accordingly, the concerned respondent is directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order subject to the following conditions:

¶19

“(i) The petitioner shall produce necessary documents before the concerned respondent to establish the ownership of the vehicle in question;

¶20

(ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), to the credit of first respondent herein, as non refundable deposit; (iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents;

¶21

(iv) On doing so, the vehicle in question shall be returned to the petitioner;

¶22

(v) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned; and

¶23

(vi) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondent.”

¶24

However, it is made clear that if the vehicle involves in the crime for the second time, the concerned respondent shall not release the vehicle.

¶25

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶28

¶29

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri Revenue Division, Musiri, Trichy District.

¶30

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station,

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Kattuputhur, Trichy District.

¶32

¶33

3.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Trichy District, Trichy.

¶34

+1CC to Mr.K.Arun Raj, Advocate, SR.No.96819

¶35

+1CC to the Special Government Pleader SR.No. 97053

¶36

W.P(MD)No.23429 of 2018

¶37

26.11.2018

¶38

VSN

¶39

ES/SKN/RSK/SAR 2/30.11.2018/3P/6C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Kannan, Contractor Vs the Tender Inviting

N. Kannan, Vs the Tender Inviting Authority

J.Celin Pragasi Vs the Superintendending Engineer

Kanagaraj, Vs the Assistant Director

K.Asokan Vs the Commissioner of Land

R.Kaliyaperumal, Vs the District Collector