The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for withdrawal by the petitioner following an endorsed application in the court records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.22752 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.20636 & 20637 of 2018
T.Subbiah ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Director of Agriculture, O/o the Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005 ... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in PaAPa2/80936/2018 dated 02.11.2018 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondent : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader.
O R D E R
Today, when the case was taken up for hearing, Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (Crl.side)
/True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)
2
To
The Director of Agriculture, O/o the Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005
TE/BK/SAR-4 : 07/12/2018 : P/C
Order in W.P.(MD)No.22752 of 2018 16.11.2018
T.Subbiah
The Director of Agriculture
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
