Partly allowed

V.Saravanakumar, v. the Superintending Engineer

Madras HC5 Feb 2018WP(MD)/224/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court partly allowed this civil miscellaneous appeal filed against an award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The Court confirmed the Tribunal's original award while directing the insurance company to deposit the compensation amount with interest and costs.

What did the court decide?

Confirmation of lower court award; direction to deposit remaining compensation with interest and costs within eight weeks; indemnification of vehicle owner.

V.Saravanakumar, Vs the Superintending Engineer — Insurance | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Wednesday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMA(MD) No.224 of 2018

¶7

1 THE REGIONAL MANAGER, THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DINDIGUL.

¶8

^nd Respondent

¶9

¶10

1 V.SUBRAMANIAN ..1^st Respondent/Petitioner

¶11

2 M.N.R.EXPORTS, CHENNAI. ..2^nd Respondent/1^st Respondent

¶12

Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal file under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the award dated 12.08.2011, passed in M.C.O.P.No. 2 of 2007 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Judge, Palani.

¶13

DECREE:-

¶14

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the grounds'of Appeal, the judgment and decree of the Lower Court and the material papers to this Appeal, and upon hearing the arguments of Mrs.K.R.Shiva Shankari, Advocate for the Appellant, and of Mr.C.Sankarprakash, Advocate for First respondent and the Second Respondent not appeared either in person or through advocate, this Court while partly allowing this appeal, doth order and decree as follows:

¶15

1.that the award dated 12.08.2011, made in in M.C.O.P.No. 2 of 2007 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Judge, Palani, be and hereby is confirmed;

¶16

2.that the appellant herein / insurance Company be and hereby is directed to deposit the entire compensation amount awarded in this appeal, less the amount already deposited, with accrued interest and costs within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment.

¶17

3.that the appellant herein / insurance Company be and hereby is directed to indemnify the owner of the vehicle herein/Second https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Respondent in the appeal and permitted to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle, as per the observation contained in the

¶18

¶19

judgment there in;

¶20

4.that on such deposit, ther claimant be and hereby is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount, as awarded by the Tribunal, less the amount already withdrawn, if any; and

¶21

5.that there be no costs in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

To 1.The Subordinate Judge / Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palani, Camp at Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

¶27

Copy to

¶28

The Record Keeper(2 copies) VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Cour, Madurai.

¶29

+1 cc to Mr. Mrs.K.R.Shiva Shankari, Advocate SR.No.100216 +1 cc to Mr. Mr.C.Sankar Prakash, Advocate SR.No.100104

¶30

KM-tr/(05.03.2019) 2P 6C

¶31

ORDER DATE:12.12.2018

¶32

CMA(MD)NO.224 OF 2018

¶33

NATURE OF DECREE

¶34

Partly Allowing the CMA against the award passed by The MACT/Sub Court, Palani, made in MCOP.No.2 of 2017, dated 12.08.2011.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Saravanakumar, v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Saravanakumar, v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Syed Abdul Rahim Vs Sandeep Nandhuri

K.Ayyapan, S/O.a.Kandasamy Vs the Sub Registrar

R.Ramar, Vs the Divisional Railway Manager

R.Rajasekaran, Vs the Manager

M.Anandhan, Vs the Superintending Engineer

Ulaganatha Pillai Alias Vs the Competent Authority Cum