S.K.Mani v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition stating that the petitioner's counsel had sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition before the court.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
S.K.Mani
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.02.2018 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition (MD) No.2239 of 2018
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
2.The Executive Officer, Sri Kailasa Nathaswamy Temple, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 13.11.2017 and made necessary entries recording the name of the petitioner as cultivating tenant for the Nanja properties in Survey No.82/1 to an extent of 1 acre 1 cent situated at Perumandi Village in Survey No.433/1 to an extent of 50 cents at Koranattu Karuppur Village, belonging to the 2nd respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Additional Government Pleader.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.K.Mani
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Sri Kailasa Nathaswamy Temple, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court