Disposed

G.Ramakrishnan v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Nov 2018WP(MD)/21763/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.09.2018 and conduct an inquiry to issue a Hindu Malaiveedan Community Certificate to his daughters within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and issue a Hindu Malaiveedan Community Certificate to his daughters after an enquiry within eight weeks.

G.Ramakrishnan Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.11.2018 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.THARANI W.P.(MD)No.21763 of 2018

G.Ramakrishnan

: Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶9

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶10

The Tahsildar Madurai West Taluk, Madurai District : Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to issue Hindu Malaiveedan Community Certificate to the petitioner's daughter viz., Archana and Santhiya respectively within a period by considering the petitioner's representations dated 14.09.2018.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader *********

¶13

ORDER

¶14

¶15

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J]

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to issue Hindu Malaiveedan Community Certificate to the petitioner's daughters viz., Archana and Santhiya respectively by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.09.2018.

¶17

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that though he made a representation dated 14.09.2018 to the respondents to issue Malaivedan Community Certificate to his daughters, the said representation has not been considered so far. Hence, he has come up with the present writ petition.

¶18

3.Considering the limited scope of the matter, without going https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ into the merits or claim made by the petitioner, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representation/application of

¶19

¶20

the petitioner for issuance of Malaivedan Community Certificate to his daughters, and pass appropriate orders, on merits, by conducting an enquiry. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion about the claim made by the petitioner. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

4.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

Sd/

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶24

/True copy/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶26

¶27

The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶28

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶29

The Tahsildar Madurai West Taluk,

¶30

Madurai District.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.T.Leninkumar, Advocate, SR.No.97212

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.21763 of 2018

¶33

27.11.2018

¶34

¶35

KK/SKN/SAR-1/06.12.2018/2P-5C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ramakrishnan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ramakrishnan v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Kmb Marbles & Granites Vs the Authorized Officer

M.Mohamed Aris Vs the Superintendent of Police

Dr.S.Venkatesh Babu Vs the Commissioner

Annakodi, Vs the District Collector

E.Hakeem Raja Vs the Sub Collector

S.Sitharthan Vs the Inspector of Police