Disposed

M.Mohamed Aris v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC26 Nov 2018HCP(MD)/1589/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court heard a Habeas Corpus petition filed by the brother of the aggrieved woman. Upon the police producing the detenu in court and receiving her statement regarding harassment fears, the Court directed police action if complaints arise and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed police to take action if harassment is complained of; petition closed.

M.Mohamed Aris Vs the Superintendent of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.11.2018

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI H.C.P.[MD].No.1589 of 2018

¶5

M.Mohamed Aris : Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

¶8

2.The Inspector of Police, Nilakkottai Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶9

3.S.M.Sarfudin 4.Saitha 5.Ajilone Beevi 6.Zarina : Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to produce the body and person of Mrs.Arabunnisa, aged 30, W/o.Askar Ali, from the illegal custody of the respondents 3 to 6 herein before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Elango For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

¶13

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.]

¶14

The present Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the brother of the detenu, seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to produce the body and person of Mrs.Arabunnisa, aged 30, W/o.Askar Ali, from the illegal custody of the respondents 3 to 6 herein before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶15

According to the petitioner, the respondents 3 to 6 are the close friends of the husband of the petitioner's sister and they used to visit his sister's house frequently. On 25.08.2018, at about https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 08.00 AM, the respondents 4 to 6 herein came to his sister's house, abused her and had beaten her with hands, suspecting that there is

¶16

¶17

illicit intimacy between his sister and the third respondent herein. Fearing for her life, the sister of the petitioner left the native place and her whereabouts were not known. In this regard, the petitioner made a complaint before the first respondent. Since there were no effective steps taken by the second respondent police to trace out the detenu, the petitioner has come up with the present Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶18

Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken up for consideration, the second respondent police produced the detenu. When we enquired the detenu, she has stated that since she was subjected to torture by the respondents 3 to 6 herein, fearing for life, she went to Ervadi Dharga. However, she has expressed her opinion that she is willing to go along with her brother and mother, who are present in Court. The detenu has further stated that if she returns back to the village, there may be harassment at the hands of the respondents 3 to 6.

¶19

In view of the above statement made by the detenu, we make it clear that if any complaint is made by the detenu, complaining that she is harassed by the respondents 3 to 6 herein, the second respondent police is directed to take appropriate action against them in accordance with law.

¶20

The Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed accordingly.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(P&A)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶25

¶26

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

¶27

2.The Inspector of Police, Nilakkottai Police Station,

¶28

Dindigul District.

¶29

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

2 CCs TO Mr.M.KAUSHIKAN , ADVOCATE IN SR Nos. 97213,97204.

¶31

¶32

DS SKN SAR1 24 12 2018 2P 6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

ORDER MADE IN H.C.P.[MD].No.1589 of 2018 26.11.2018

M.Mohamed Aris v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mohamed Aris v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Thangavel, S/O.Ramasamy, Vs the District Collector

1.DEEPU Bharath Mohan Vs the District Collector

Nps Nisha, W/O.S.Seiyyad Vs the Commissioner

M.Farithabegam Vs the District Collector

Amirtham Vs the Superintendent of Police

Dr.S.Venkatesh Babu Vs the Commissioner