The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus seeking compassionate appointment. The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on counsel’s representation without further details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.01.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P(MD)No.19939 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
Sukumaran .. Petitioner
Vs
Karur District.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.1135/A4/2013 dated 14.11.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to consider the claim of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment befitting with educational qualification.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan
For R-1 & R-3 : Mr.C.Selvaraj,
Special Government Pleader
For R-2 : Mr.G.Muthukannan
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner represented that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2
2.In view of the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
W.P(MD)No.19939 of 2013 03.01.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukumaran
The District Collector, Karur
The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Krishnarayapuram
The District Elementary Educational Officer, Karur
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
