Dismissed

U.Angayarkanni, v. the Principal Secretary/

Madras HC2 Jan 2018WP(MD)/2791/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed composite writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for C.I. in two connected writs and miscellaneous petitions as infructuous after the petitioner claimed the prayers had become unworkable and made an endorsement to that effect.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as infructuous; connected M.P. Nos. closed; No costs awarded.

U.Angayarkanni, Vs the Principal… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.01.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.2791 and 2792 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).Nos.3, 3 and 4 of 2011

¶7

W.P.(MD).No.2791 of 2011:

¶8

1.U.Angayarkanni 2.R.J.A.Ravindran

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai-5.

¶12

The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶13

The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Madurai.

¶14

The District Collector, Karur, Karur District.

¶15

K.Muthusamy Thasildhar, Karur District Revenue Unit, Karur District. ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Lr.No.Ser.1(3)/DC 28/2011 dated 18.02.2011 and quashing the same in respect of the 5^th respondent alone as illegal and without jurisdiction.

¶17

For Petitioners : Mr.B.Saravanan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.V.Murugananthan Additional Government Pleader

¶18

¶19

W.P.(MD).No.2792 of 2011:

¶20

1.U.Angayarkanni 2.R.J.A.Ravindran

¶21

... Petitioners

¶22

Vs. 1. The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai-5. 2. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Madurai. 4. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 5. N.Arumuga Nainar Thasildhar, Ramanathapuram District Revenue Unit, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents

¶23

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Lr. No. Ser.1(3)/DC 28/2011 dated 18.02.2011 and quashing the same in respect of the 5^th respondent alone as illegal and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Saravanan For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.V.Murugananthan Additional Government Pleader

¶24

ORDER

¶25

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer in these writ petitions have become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

¶27

Recording the same, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, M.P.(MD).Nos.3, 3 and 4 of 2011 are closed.

¶28

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶29

/True Copy/

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶31

¶32

The Principal Secreatry/ Commissioner's of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai-5. 2. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation, Madurai. 4. The District Collector, Karur, Karur District. 5. The Thasildhar, Karur District Revenue Unit, Karur District. 6. The Thasildhar, Ramanathapuram District Revenue Unit, Ramanathapuram District.

¶33

2 CC TO Mr.B.SARAVANAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 40310 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 40114 VSG/IA TE/SV-MMS/SAR-4 : 18/01/2018 : 3P/10C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

W.P.(MD)Nos.2791 and 2792 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).Nos.3, 3 and 4 of 2011 02.01.2018

U.Angayarkanni, v. the Principal Secretary/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

U.Angayarkanni, v. the Principal Secretary/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meera, Vs The Commissioner

M/S.Tussor Machine Tools Vs the Director

K.Muruganandham, Vs Union Territory of Puducherry

A.Lakshminarayanan Vs the Joint Director of

K. Rajini, Narimedu, Vs the Commissioner

R.Susila Vs the District Collector