Writ petition challenging survey of land based on alleged forged documents was dismissed as infructuous when petitioner conceded the land had already been surveyed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.(MD) No.18931 of 2018
E.Thirumal ... Petitioner
vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the Second Respondent to issue an order not to permit the Surveying the petitioner Land on the basis of the forged Patta No:935 being supported by two forged documents Nos:745/2013 and 167/2018 based on the representation dated 18.08.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Char Murugan
For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthu Karuppan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi for R3
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's land has been surveyed and therefore, the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for
2
the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CO)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)
To:
KRK
TE/PM/SAR-4 : 27/10/2018 : 2P/5C
W.P.(MD) No.18931 of 2018
03.10.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E. Thirumal
District Collector
Tashildhar
N. Paul Richard
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
