Dismissed

Shanthi Nageswaran v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC3 Oct 2018WP(MD)/15559/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking an order for electricity connection under Section 43 of the Electricity Supply Act, 2003. The court directed the second respondent to grant the connection within a week, subject to pending arbitration.

What did the court decide?

Directed to grant electricity service connection within one week, subject to pending arbitration outcome.

Shanthi Nageswaran Vs the Tahsildar — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2018 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.(MD) No.15559 of 2018

¶4

Shanthi Nageswaran ... Petitioner

¶5

vs.

¶6

1.The Tahsildar Chatram Management Thanjavur District

¶7

2.The Executive Engineer TANGEDCO, Aranthangi ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the 1^st respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7071/2015/Sat.Ni.E/ dated 29.06.2018, quash the same and consequently directing the 2^nd respondent to provide electricity connection as per the sec.43 of the electricity supply act, 2003 based on the application submitted by the petitioner on 05.06.2018.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 Ms.M.Rajeswari for Mr.S.M.S.Johnny Basha for R2

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that electricity service connection, as required by the petitioner, would be granted subject to the pending arbitration proceedings before the second respondent.

¶12

In view of the above undertaking given by the learned counsel for the second respondent, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this writ petition. The second respondent is directed to grant electricity service connection to the petitioner's premises, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and such electricity service connection granted to the petitioner's premises is subject to the final outcome of the arbitration proceedings pending between the parties.

¶13

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶14

Sd/

¶15

Assistant Registrar(Crl Side)

¶16

/True copy/

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

To:

1.The Tahsildar,

Chatram Management, Thanjavur District.

¶23

2.The Executive Engineer,

¶24

TANGEDCO, Aranthangi.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.R.M.ARUN SWAMINATHAN, Advocate, SR.No.88881 +1cc to M/s.Special Government Pleader,SR.No.88828

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.15559 of 2018

¶27

03.10.2018

¶28

KK/RSK/SAR-1/26.10.2018/2P-5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Shanthi Nageswaran v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanthi Nageswaran v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandiyan, S/O.Chinnaelangan, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

The Manager & Secretary, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Muniyasamy Vs the Passport Issuing Authority

E.Thirumal, Vs the District Collector

S.Shahul Hameed, Vs the Chairman

Viswam Alias Unni Vs the Superintending Engineer