Dismissed

A.Tamilselvan, v. the Managing Director

Madras HC23 Oct 2018WP(MD)/18461/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special Writer (Madras) Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking to quash a licence granted by the first respondent to a fourth respondent, after the counsel for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition. The connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

A.Tamilselvan, Vs the Managing Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.10.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.18461 of 2018 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)Nos.16364 and 16365 of 2018

¶8

A.Tamilselvan ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers, 34 (123) 6^th Floor, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3. The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, District Collectorate Office, Thoothukudi. 4. S.Madasamy No.110, Muthuramalingar Street, Gandhi Nagar, Kovilpatti-628502, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order Seyalmurai Aanai No.B24/6074/2017 dated 01.06.2018 issued by the first respondent for granting licence to the fourth respondent permitting him to establish cable connection in the areas allotted to the petitioner and quash the same and consequently, direct the first and third respondents to remove the connections which is given by the fourth respondent to the areas allotted to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sam Eugine Jebakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan

¶13

AGP (for R1 to R3) Mr.P.Gunasekaran G.A (for R4)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶16

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶19

/True Copy/

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)

¶21

¶22

The Managing Director,

¶23

Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers,

¶24

34 (123) 6^th Floor, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶25

The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶26

The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, District Collectorate Office, Thoothukudi.

¶27

1 CC TO Mr.M.SAM EUGINE JEBAKUMAR, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 91177 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 91392

¶28

SKN

¶29

TE/SKN/SAR-4 : 13/11/2018 : 2P/6C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.18461 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.16364 and 16365 of 2018

¶32

23.10.2018

A.Tamilselvan, v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Tamilselvan, v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Irulappan, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

V.Arumugam Asari, Vs the Joint Commissioner

M.Ganesh, Vs the Regional Passport Officer

E.Arulanantham Vs the Assistant Commissioner

R.K.Veerasamy, Vs the District Revenue Officer

C.Balasubramanian Vs the Tahsildar