Disposed

S.Pathravathi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Oct 2018WP(MD)/18411/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order permits the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to specific respondents regarding the survey of her land. The court directs those officials to consider the representation and pass orders on merits within four weeks after a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit fresh representation; Respondents 3 and 4 directed to pass orders on merits within four weeks after personal hearing.

S.Pathravathi, Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.10.2018

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.18411 of 2018

¶6

S.Pathravathi

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai West Taluk, Madurai District. 4.The Firka Surveyor, Madurai Firka, Madurai West Taluk, Dindigul District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalaipudhukottai Police Station, Madurai District. ...Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 4 to survey the petitioner's land comprised in survey No.3 and 4 to survey the land belonged to Lala Sri Renga Chathiram comprised in survey No.103/1 and 97 situating at Kochadai village, and demarcate the four boundaries of the same within the time stipulated by this Court, consequently directing the respondent Nos.2 and 5 to provide adequate police protection to authorities at the time of surveying the land.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar Addl. Govt. Pleader

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The prayer sought for in this writ petition is as follows:“To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 4 to survey the petitioner's land comprised in survey No.3 and 4 to survey the land belonged to Lala Sri Renga Chathiram comprised in survey No.103/1 and 97 situating at Kochadai village, and demarcate the four boundaries of the same within the time stipulated by this Court, consequently directing the respondent Nos.2 and 5 to provide adequate police protection to authorities at the time of surveying the land.”

¶15

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requested this Court to permit the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents 3 and 4 and on such representation is being made afresh, the same may be ordered to be considered by the respondents.

¶16

3.In view of the limited prayer as sought by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶17

(i) The petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation to the respondents 3 and 4 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

(ii) On such representation is being made within the time stipulated by this Court, the respondents 3 and 4 are directed to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as the any other interested parties, within a period of four weeks thereafter. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(PROTOCOL)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS IV)

¶23

skn

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector,

¶26

Office of the District Collector,

¶27

Madurai District.

¶28

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai District.

¶30

¶31

3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai West Taluk, Madurai District. 4.The Firka Surveyor, Madurai Firka, Madurai West Taluk, Dindigul District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalaipudhukottai Police Station, Madurai District. 1CC TO MR. S. MALAIKANI, ADVOCATE SR 90157 1CC TO THE SPL GOVT PLEADER SR 90417 DS RSK SAR 4 9 11 2018 3P 8C

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.18411 of 2018

¶33

11.10.2018

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Pathravathi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Pathravathi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ravichandran, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Arumuga Nainar Vs the District Collector

G.Pitchaiya Vs the Registrar of Societies /

S.Pathravathi, Vs the District Collector

G.S.Sandhru Vs the Controller of Examinations

C.Janaki Vs the Secretary