The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking direction to permit operation of a bank account was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.(MD) No.18342 of 2015
M.Muthu
vs.
The Bracnh Manager, State Bank of India, Dindigul Branch, Dindigul. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to operate his bank account bearing A/c.No.10832761908 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2015 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 23.10.2018 to the Registry seeking permission to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, the matter appeared today under the caption "for withdrawal". The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)
NS
TE/SKN/SAR-4 : 13/11/2018 : 1P/2C
M.Muthu
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Dindigul Branch
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
