Allowed

D.M.Venkateswaran, v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Madras HC26 Mar 2018WP(MD)/1832/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench directed the Chief Commissioner to decide petitions for waiver of interest under Sections 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act within four months and ordered a stay on property auctions pending such decision after filing of dues.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Chief Commissioner to decide waiver of interest petitions within four months and stay property auctions pending the decision.

D.M.Venkateswaran, Vs the Assistant… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.03.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.1832, 1835 and 1885 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos. 1955, 1959 and 2053 of 2018

¶7

D.M.Venkateswaran ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1832 of 2018 D.M.Maheswaran ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1835 of 2018 M.Jeya ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1885 of 2018

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Non Corporate Circle-II, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai- 625 002.

¶10

2.The Tax Recovery Officer, Central Range, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai-625 002.

¶11

3.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai.

¶12

(Suo motu impleaded as third respondent vide order dated 26.03.2018) ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.1832 of 2018: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents and direct the first respondent to deal with the waiver petition filed by the petitioner in manner known to law at the earliest and till such time the second respondent may be directed to defer the recovery action against the petitioner vide proclamation of sale in Form No.I.T.C.P.13 (See Rule 38 and Rule 52(2) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961), bearing No.T.R.No.73/TRO-2/MDU-2017-18 dated 04.01.2018 posting the public auction at 11 AM on 07.02.2018 at Madurai as the petitioner is willing to pay the total tax amount in installment without taking into account the interest, levied under section 234 A and 234 B, 220(2) and Rule 5 interest under the Income Tax Act, 1961 that may be leviable.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.1835 of 2018: This Petition is filed under

¶16

¶17

Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents and direct the first respondent to deal with the waiver petition filed by the petitioner in manner known to law at the earliest and till such time the second respondent may be directed to defer the recovery action against the petitioner vide proclamation of sale in Form No.I.T.C.P.13 (See Rule 38 and Rule 52(2) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961), bearing No.T.R.No.119/TRO-1/MDU-2017-18 dated 04.01.2018 posting the public auction at 11 AM on 07.02.2018 at Madurai as the petitioner is willing to pay the total tax amount in installment without taking into account the interest, levied under section 234 A and 234 B, 220(2) and Rule 5 interest under the Income Tax Act, 1961 that may be leviable.

¶18

PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.1885 of 2018: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the respondents and direct the first respondent to deal with the waiver petition filed by the petitioner in manner known to law for the Assessment year 2001-2002 to 20072008 respectively at the earliest and till such time the second respondent may be directed to defer the recovery action against the petitioner vide proclamation of sale in Form No.I.T.C.P.13 (See Rule 38 and Rule 52(2) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961), bearing No.T.R.No.103/TRO-1/MDU-2017-18 dated 04.01.2018 posting the public auction at 11 AM on 07.02.2018 at Madurai as the petitioner is willing to pay the total tax amount in installment without taking into account the interest, levied under section 234 A and 234 B, 220(2) and Rule 5 interest under the Income Tax Act, 1961 that may be leviable.

¶19

For petitioners : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Srimathy Standing Counsel for Income Tax (in all the Writ petitions)

¶20

COMMON ORDER

¶21

¶22

The issue raised in all these writ petitions is one and the same. The writ petitioners were treated as Assessees in default and their properties were brought to sale. At this stage, these writ petitions came to be filed.

¶23

The matter was taken up for admission on 02.02.2018. This Court issued certain directions for payment of a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- (Twenty Five Lakhs only) on or before 23.03.2018. Today, when the matter was taken again, the learned counsel for the writ petitioners submit that the directions given by this Court have been complied with full.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. Taking note of this submission, the third respondent herein is directed to dispose of the petitions filed by the writ

¶25

¶26

petitioners for waiver of interest.

¶27

The learned counsel for the writ petitioners submit that two petitions seeking waiver of interest under Sections 234 A and 234 B of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 220(2A) of Income Tax Act, 1961, submitted to the first respondent herein have since been forwarded by the third respondent and that enquiry has since commenced. The third respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the said proceedings are concluded, the properties of the writ petitioners shall not be brought to sale.

¶28

Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of. No

¶29

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(P&A)

¶30

/True Copy/

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

¶33

1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Non Corporate Circle-II, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai- 625 002.

¶34

2.The Tax Recovery Officer, Central Range, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai-625 002.

¶35

3.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai.

¶36

+3CC to Mr.V.S.Jeyakumar, Advocate, SR.No. 58019, 58020, 58021 +1CC to Mrs.S.Srimathy, Advocate, SR.No. 58096

¶37

ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)Nos.1832, 1835 and 1885 of 2018 26.03.2018

¶38

Pnn

¶39

AM/KKR/SAR 3/03.05.2018/3P/8C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.M.Venkateswaran, v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.M.Venkateswaran, v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Andi, S/O.Karuppan, Vs the Director of Townpanchayats

R.Gomathy, Vs the Secretary to Government

R.Kumar Vs the Administrative Officer

The Sericulture Department Vs the Presiding Officer

Gvk Emergency Management Vs the Presiding Officer

M.Saravanan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu