Disposed

R.Gomathy, v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC23 Mar 2018WP(MD)/3667/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regularization of his services as a Mazdoor after completing 10 years of service. The Court directed the Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, to consider the representation on merits and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.

R.Gomathy, Vs the Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.03.2018

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

W.P.(MD) No.3667 of 2018

¶6

R.Gomathi ...Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Chief Engineer (General) and Engineer in Chief, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 3.The Chief Engineer (Regional), Madurai Region, Madurai – 2. 4.The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Organization (WRO), Public Works Department, Irukkangudi Water Basin Division, Virudhunagar District.

¶9

5.The Executive Engineer, Periyar Improvement Division – 7, Madurai.

¶10

6.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department,

¶11

Water Resource Organization, Vaipparu Basin Circle, Virudhunagar. 7.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Irukkangudi Water Basis Sub Division No.I, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner herein on and after

¶13

¶14

completion of 10 years of services on the basis of the representation dated 13/09/2017 as per the government letter No.tha.2/1304/09, dated 25/09/2009 and within a time to be stipulated by this Court.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ramachandran

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The writ petitioner is working as NMR, Mazdoor under the Engineer, Periyar Improvement Division No.7, Madurai. According to him, he has put in service for more than 10 years. Therefore, he seeks regularization. In this regard, he gave a representation on 13.09.2017.

¶19

2.The second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

3.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

¶23

1.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

¶24

2.The Chief Engineer (General) and Engineer in Chief, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.

¶25

3.The Chief Engineer (Regional), Madurai Region, Madurai – 2.

¶26

4.The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Organization (WRO), Public Works Department, Irukkangudi Water Basin Division, Virudhunagar District.

¶27

5.The Executive Engineer, Periyar Improvement Division – 7, Madurai.

¶28

6.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resource Organization, Vaipparu Basin Circle, Virudhunagar.

¶29

7.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Irukkangudi Water Basis Sub Division No.I, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶30

+1CC to Mr.P.Rama Chandran, Advocate, SR.No. 57545

¶31

+1CC to the Special Government Pleader SR.No.58457 W.P.(MD) No.3667 of 2018 23.03.2018

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ rmm AM/JC/SAR 4/08.05.2018/2P/10C

R.Gomathy, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Gomathy, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Industrial Mineral Company Vs the Commissioner of Customs

M/S.Industrial Meineral Co, Vs the Commissioner of Customs

S.Udhayakumar Vs Union of India

Andi, S/O.Karuppan, Vs the Director of Townpanchayats

R.Kumar Vs the Administrative Officer

R.v.Rajavel, Vs the Commissioner