The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioner who sought permission citing the prayer having become infructuous.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
W.P.[MD].No.17876 of 2018
A.Ponnammal : Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachment put up by the third respondent in Survey No.116/12, Ranasingapuram Village, Tirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District, as expeditiously as possible.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.3 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.]
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, since the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (RTI)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)
2
To
NB
TE/SV/SAR-4 : 19/12/2018 : 2P/4C
ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD].No.17876 of 2018 20.11.2018
A.Ponnammal
The District Collector, Sivagangai District
The Tahsildar, Tirupathur Taluk
Sathyabama
R.SUBBIAH
R.THARANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
