Disposed

K.Pandi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC20 Aug 2018WP(MD)/17823/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP(MD) No.17823 of 2018, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted the petitioner 10 days to comply with a previous order dated 20.08.2018 directing payment of Rs.10,000/- costs to the Keral Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund, setting a deadline of 11.02.2019.

What did the court decide?

Time granted till 11.02.2019 for complying with payment of costs and post for reporting compliance by 12.02.2019.

K.Pandi, Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶4

Friday, the First day of February Two Thousand Nineteen

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and

¶7

The Hon`ble Mr Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶8

WP(MD) No.17823 of 2018

¶9

K.PANDI ... PETITIONER

¶10

¶11

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶12

2 THE SUB COLLECTOR, DEVAKOTTAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶13

3 THE TAHSILDAR

¶14

DEVAKOTTAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned passed by the 3rd respondent vide Na.Ka.A5-5512-2015, dated 06.08.2018, and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to resurvey the land in S.No.184/35 and 184/37, situated at Thirani Village, Devakottai Tk., Sivagangai District

¶16

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M.S.KRISHNAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶17

This Court by order dated 20.08.2018 while dismissing the writ petition, directed the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Kerela Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF) with in a period of two weeks.

¶18

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that further 10 days may be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ granted for complying with such condition.

¶19

¶20

Hence, time is granted till 11.02.2019. Post on 12.02.2019. “for reporting compliance”. sd/-

¶21

01/02/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶23

Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2 THE SUB COLLECTOR, DEVAKOTTAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3 THE TAHSILDAR DEVAKOTTAI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶26

COPY TO

¶27

THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. PS/JC/SAR-1/07.02.2019/2P/5C

¶28

ORDER IN WP(MD) No.17823 of 2018 Date :01/02/2019

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Pandi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Pandi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Ess Ess Tool Room Services Vs the Chief Manager &

R.Lakshmi Devi, Vs Secretary to the Government

V.Senthil Kumar Vs the Authorised Officer

K.Kanthasamy, Vs the District Collector

M/S. Haribala Krishna Vs the District Collector

K.Eluvan Vs the District Collector