Dismissed

Pushparani, v. the Assistant Director

Madras HC6 Aug 2018WP(MD)/17372/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order disposes of a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct disposal of an election petition within a fixed timeframe. The court closed the petition as the issue was already covered by a recent Division Bench order in a related batch, granting liberty to follow the law laid down therein.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; liberty granted to work out remedy as per previous Division Bench order; no costs.

Pushparani, Vs the Assistant Director — Election Law | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2018 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶4

W.P.(MD)No.17372 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).No.15288 of 2018

¶5

1.Pushparani 2.Sesu Antony Selvi 3.Pushpalatha

¶6

4.Priya

¶7

5.Kamala

¶8

6.Muneeswari

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Rameshwaram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

Arunachalam

¶13

Laila

¶14

Alamelu

¶15

Geetharamani

¶16

Marieswari

¶17

Murugayee

¶18

Pandiarani 9. Vimala ... Respondents

¶19

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the election petition filed by the petitioners challenging the election of the respondents 3 to 9 as directors of the RMW 76, Bharathi Nagar Fisherwomen Cooperative Society including the rejection of the nomination papers of the petitioners by the second respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For R1 : Mr.K.Chellapandian Additional Advocate General for Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH,J.]

¶25

The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the election petition filed by the petitioners, challenging the election of the respondents 3 to 9 as Directors of the RMW 76, Bharathi Nagar Fisherwomen Co-operative Society including the rejection of the nomination papers of the petitioners by the second respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶26

Inasmuch as the issue has been covered by the order of Division Bench of the Principal Bench dated 03.08.2018 in W.P.Nos.7526 of 2018 etc. batch, the Writ Petition stands closed by giving liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy as per law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶27

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶29

¶30

The Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Rameshwaram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶31

+1CC to Mr.T.R.Jeyapalan, Advocate in SR.No.77539.

¶32

+1CC to Special Government Pleader in SR.No.77554.

¶33

AAV

¶34

DS/SKN-RSK/SAR-4 :10.08.2018: 2P/4C

¶35

06.08.2018

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pushparani, v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushparani, v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Manimala Vs v. Muthuraman

The Board of Trustees of Vs M/S.Psa Sical Terminals Ltd.

Tamil Nadu Registrar General Vs R. Rajeswari

P. Pilavadi Krishnan Vs the Superintendent of Police

A. Anitha Vs the Superintendent of Police

Aibea Nagar(Paravai) Residents Vs the Chairman