A. Anitha v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Habeas Corpus petition by a wife for production of her husband. Court noted mediation resulted in an agreement between parties, leading to closure of the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 06.08.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.(MD)No.289 of 2018
A.Anitha ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
- The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mallanginar East Police Station, Mallanginar, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the second respondent to produce the body or person of the petitioner's husband namely C.Govindaraj, S/o.S.Chinnasamy, aged about 29 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Anitha
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
- respondent
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mallanginar East Police Station
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court