The Madurai bench dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking a mandamus order for a tribal community certificate for his son. The court held the petition lacked basic basis as the petitioner failed to produce requisite revenue records or community certificates of his parents or siblings.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.09.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.(MD) No.17079 of 2018
Rajendran
... Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul.
3.The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue Kurumans Tribe Community Certificate in favour of the petitioner son Suryamoorthy by considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For Respondents : Mr.V.Anand Government Advocate
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA, J.]
This writ petition has been filed without any basic basis or foundation seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue Kurumans Tribe Community Certificate in favour of the petitioner's son Suryamoorthy on the basis of his representation dated 07.03.2018.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner regretfully argued before us in support of the prayer that the petitioner is not having community certificate. Moreover, the petitioner has also not
2
produced community certificate issued in favour of his parents, brothers, sisters or his relatives and only on the basis of the community certificate issued in favour of the wife of the petitioner, he has come to this Court seeking for a direction to issue community certificate in favour of his son.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4.It is not known how the petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the revenue authorities to issue community certificate for his son on the basis of his wife's community certificate, that was also not issued by the Revenue Authority in Tamil Nadu. When he belongs to a particular community, he should have come to this Court with all the requisite revenue records including the community certificate issued by the revenue authority in favour of his father, mother or brother. No such vital documents have been produced before us. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the writ petition filed without any supporting documents. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
SD
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( A.S.)
TRUE COPY
SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (CS III)
mj To
1.The District Collector, District Collector Office,Dindigul.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul.
3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.
1CC TO MR. R. MANOHARAN, ADVOCATE SR 82373 1CC TO THE SPL GOVT PLEADER SR 82512
KK SV SAR 3
4 10 2018 2P 6C
W.P.(MD) No.17079 of 2018
03.09.2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing issuance of a tribal community certificate for his son based solely on his wife's certificate.
Whether the petitioner has produced requisite revenue records and community certificates of his close relatives to substantiate his claim.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendran
District Collector
Revenue Divisional Officer
Tahsildar
T.RAJA
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
