Dismissed

A.Rajini, Founder Member- v. the Bar Council of Tamilnadu

Madras HC24 Jul 2018WP(MD)/15768/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash election notification and voters list of Women Advocates' Association. The court granted leave to withdraw the petition. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

None granted. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

A.Rajini, Founder Member- Vs the Bar Council of… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.07.2018 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.[MD].No.15768 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.14127 and 14128 of 2018

¶4

A.Rajini,

¶5

Founder Member - Advocate,

¶6

Women Advocate Association,

¶7

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. : Petitioner Vs.

¶8

The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu,

¶9

High Court Buildings, Chennai.

¶10

The Election Officer, Women Advocates' Association [WAA], Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶11

Ms.Krishnaveni, President, Women Advocates' Association [WAA], Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶12

Ms.Jeya Indira Patel, Vice President, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶13

Ms.Anantha Valli, Secretary, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶14

Ms.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi, Treasurer, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶15

Ms.Dhanalakshmi, Joint Secretary, Women Advocates' Association,

¶16

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶17

Ms.Shankari,

¶18

Convener,

¶19

Women Advocates' Association, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶20

¶21

Ms.Vijaya Rathinam,

¶22

Librarian, Women Advocates' Association,

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. : Respondents

¶24

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in WAA [Women Advocate Associations] election notification dated 29.06.2018 and consequent voters list 12.07.2018 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to prepare a fresh voters list and fresh election notification.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mrs.A.Rajini Party-in-person

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

***************

¶28

[ Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice] On the prayer of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, leave is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

¶29

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(W) /True Copy/

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III) To 1. The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, High Court Buildings, Chennai. 2. The Election Officer, Women Advocates' Association [WAA], Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3. The President, Women Advocates' Association [WAA], Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4. The Vice President, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5. The Secretary, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The Treasurer, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

¶32

The Joint Secretary, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

The Convener, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

The Librarian, Women Advocates' Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

¶36

VB/KAK/SAR3/13.08.2018/3P/10C

¶37

ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD].No.15768 of 2018

¶38

24.07.2018

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Rajini, Founder Member- v. the Bar Council of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Rajini, Founder Member- v. the Bar Council of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumuga Nadar, Vs Tuticorin Salt & Marine

Natarajan, Vs Jayakumar

M.Karuthapandi Vs the Divisional Manager

K.Sabarimuthu Vs the District Collector

K.Sivaraj Vs the District Collector

K.K.Ramesh, Vs the Union of India