Disposed

P.Alexander, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC22 Jun 2018WP(MD)/13275/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for patta issuance for specific land survey numbers based on a representation dated 26.09.2017. The court directed the Tahsildar to verify records and conduct an enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to verify records and conduct an enquiry; to pass orders within two months.

P.Alexander, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶3

W.P.(MD) No.13275 of 2018

P.Alexander

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶8

Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

¶9

2.The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for issuance of patta for the land in Survey Nos.13/7A1, 13/7A2 and 13/7A3 to an extent of 0.04.30, 0.00.5 and 0.085 Hectares respectively situated at Ambalapattu North Village, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District based on his representation dated 26.09.2017 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.S.Nagarajan Special Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for issuance of patta for the land in Survey Nos.13/7A1, 13/7A2 and 13/7A3 to an extent of 0.04.30, 0.00.5 and 0.085 Hectares respectively situated at Ambalapattu North Village, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District based on his representation dated 26.09.2017 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶15

Without going into the merits of the case, a direction is issued the second respondent to verify the revenue and other records as to its classification, ownership, possession, enjoyment, rival https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ claims, civil disputes etc., in respect of the property and conduct an enquiry after affording opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties interested for the purpose of survey of the land and

¶16

¶17

pass orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶19

No costs. Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur,

¶25

Thanjavur District.

¶26

The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk,

¶27

Thanjavur District.

¶28

¶29

MK/SV/SAR 2/04.07.2018/2P/3C

¶30

W.P.(MD) No.13275 of 2018 22.06.2018

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Alexander, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Alexander, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saraswathi, Vs the District Collector

A.Ramakrishnan Vs the Shipping Master

Manickanathan Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

N.Mareeswari, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Sebastian, Vs the Commissioner of Land

P.Siva Kumar, Vs the Sub Registrar