Allowed

K.Karupana Thevar v. the District Collector

Madras HC21 Jun 2018WP(MD)/13151/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice M. Govindaraj issued a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector and Tahsildhar to verify records and conduct an enquiry with an opportunity of personal hearing for surveying the petitioner's lands to determine field boundaries within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to verify records, conduct an enquiry with a personal hearing opportunity, and pass orders for land survey to point out field boundaries within two months.

K.Karupana Thevar Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.06.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.13151 of 2018

¶7

K.Karupana Thevar ... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai.

¶10

2.The Tahsildhar, Office of the Tahsildhar, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶11

3.The Firca Surveyor, Sollapuram Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to survey my properties in survey numbers: 142/5A and 142/5B with an extent of Acre 2 Cent 6 situated at Soolapuram Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District to point out field boundary line based on the petitioner's application dated 03.03.2017 within in the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manikandan

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.S.Nagarajan Special Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to survey the petitioner's properties in survey numbers: 142/5A and 142/5B with an extent of Acre 2 Cent 6 situated at Soolapuram Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District to point out field boundary line based on the petitioner's application dated 03.03.2017.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶18

¶19

Without going into the merits of the case, a direction is

¶20

issued the second respondent to verify the revenue and other records as to its classification, ownership, possession, enjoyment, rival claims, civil disputes etc., in respect of the property and conduct an enquiry, after affording opportunity of personal hearing to all the parties interested for the purpose of survey of the land and pass orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildhar, Office of the Tahsildhar, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶26

3.The Firca Surveyor, Sollapuram Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

¶27

+1cc to M/S.K.Manikandan, Advocate SR.No. 69278

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.13151 of 2018 21.06.2018

¶29

¶30

JM/RSK/SAR 2/11.07.2018/2P/5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Karupana Thevar v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Karupana Thevar v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Kanagaraj, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

V.Anandan Vs the District Collector

Karunanithi, Vs the District Collector

Saraswathi, Vs the District Collector

A.Ramakrishnan Vs the Shipping Master

Manickanathan Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer