M. Marichelvam, v. the Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ of mandamus under Article 226 for reconsideration of a representation regarding service status. Court found prayer infructuous due to subsequent reinstatement and termination, closing petition with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed with no order as to costs; prayer held infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P(MD)No.12882 of 2011
M.Marichelvam
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai) Limited, By-pass Road, Madurai – 625 010. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.09.2011 in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.7897 of 2008 dated 17.09.2010.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Jeyaram
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for mandamus remains maintainable after the petitioner was reinstated and subsequently terminated.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Marichelvam
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai) Limited
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court