N. Chandrasekaran, v. the Commandant
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed the writ petition filed against a disciplinary order, noting that the proceedings were concluded and a removal order had already been passed.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition stands closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.02.2018 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.12452 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011
N.Chandrasekaran, Armourer Havildar, Qater Master Group, Temporary ''B''Company, Tamil Nadu Special Police, First Battalion, Trichy, Trichy District.
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, First Battalion, Trichy-12.
2.The Enquiry Officer/
Assistant Commandant-III, Tamil Nadu Special Police,
First Battalion, Trichy -12. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent bearing Ta.Pa.No.23 of 2011, dated 19.8.2011 and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.M.Gnanagurunathan For Respondents : Ms.V.P.M.Vaishnavi Government Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Chandrasekaran
- respondent
The Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, First Battalion, Trichy
- respondent
The Enquiry Officer/ Assistant Commandant-III, Tamil Nadu Special Police, First Battalion, Trichy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court