Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of an order. A compromise was found between parties. Court directed parties to approach the authority based on the settlement.
Writ petition disposed of directing parties to approach respondent authority for orders based on the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2018 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition (MD).No.12067 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2014
1.A.Venkatasamy
2.Rajammal
3.Ayyappan
4.V.Subbammal
5.V.Rajendran ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The District Collector, Theni District.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni, Theni District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.
4.The Tahsildar, Andipatti, Theni District.
5.Rathinam
6.Baluchamynaicker
7.Jakkiyan ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.33804/2011/D4, dated 14.07.2014, quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Maria Roseline For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.D.Muruganantham
Additional Governement Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents 5 to 7 : Mr.A.K.Manikam
2
ORDER
Heard Mr.J.Marie Roseline, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.D.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.A.K.Manikam, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 5 to 7.
2.The learned counsel for the parties reported that the compromise has been evolved between the petitioner and the respondents 5 to 7. Recording the same, the contempt petition which was filed for wilful disobedience of the interim order is closed by order dated 01.03.2018.
3.In view of the compromise settled between the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of by directing the parties to approach the respondent authority for necessary orders. Based upon the settlement arrived at, and as and when the application is given, the official respondents shall consider the same and act accordingly. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar
To 1.The District Collector, Theni District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni, Theni District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District. 4.The Tahsildar, Andipatti, Theni District. Mrn RL/5C/2P/CVC/SAR1/19/3/2018
Writ Petition (MD).No.12067 of 2014
01.03.2018 ( 2/2)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Venkatasamy and ors.
District Collector, Theni District
District Revenue Officer, Theni
Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam
Tahsildar, Andipatti
Rathinam and ors.
T.S. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
